October 1st 2020 - ACROSS THE STAGNANT POND
The current POTUS made it clear when he came into office that he had one aim for his country and, on Tuesday night, he proved to me, without a shadow of a
doubt that he had achieved it. If his performance is indicative of the United States way of life than I have to say I have never heard anything that would grate on me more
than his display.
He was rude, disrespectful, ignorant, ill-mannered, incapable of answering any question, full of himself and, in my humble opinion, a bumbling buffoon. If you
reflect on the fact that this man leads one of the most powerful countries in the world, you can only live your life in fear. He failed to condemn a right wing white
supremacist organisation then tweeted something different. When asked about the organisation he said he'd never heard of them but, sadly, this is an approach he
has taken before when he is questioned on a statement he has made. He denies it although recordings actually exist of him saying it.
It really is an amazing world that we live in. Still, let's hope that after November we can all hope that the United States might move toward becoming great
again, if it ever was, and no longer just grate on us all from everything the POTUS does.
October 2nd 2020 - THINKING YOU KNOW BETTER AND DISCOVERING YOU DON'T
Not wishing harm on anyone, I hope that the President of the Untied States of America, his wife and a fair few number of his staff, make a full recovery
from COVID-19. However, in the same way people have been criticising students and others for not adhering to advice on ways to slow the spread of the disease,
it has been very obvious to all who watch, that the POTUS, his family and close colleagues have also failed to take the sensible advice which has been given out
by, in his case, his own medical advisers.
Let's leave it at that for the week. Have a good weekend and see you next week.
October 5th 2020 - DID YOU KNOW MACHINES CAN GO WRONG?
I wrote last month, September 25th to be precise, that we have become completely dependent on modern technology and worryingly often have no back-up when,
as it inevitably will, it fails. I read today that Dr Vyv Evans, a linguist, has said that the younger generations won't know when we oldies tap our wrist to
indicate we want to know the time or write in the air to indicate we want the bill at a restaurant. Time is now told on a phone and I can see that and we all
use contactless payment, don't we?
How wonderful this new technology dependent world is; sometimes. Today some of the UK's most important figures in industry were hoping (???) to take part
in an exclusive on-line question-and-answer session with the Prime Minister and the Chancellor. However, for over an hour, they were left looking at a buffering
screen before it could start. Whether they then got any answers from the PM is obviously debatable. No one else ever does.
How wonderful this new technology dependent world is: sometimes. It was a computer problem, albeit man-made, that has been blamed for Public Health England
somehow losing nearly 16,000 people who had tested positive for coronavirus. They were, of course, using our world beating system. But, don't worry, our trusty
contacts tracers are now working as hard as possible to redress the situation .....except their phone lines all crashed as they were trying to reach tens of
thousands of potentially infectious people. The tracers reported conversations disconnecting mid-call and then being frozen out of the system for up to half an
hour when they tried to call back.
The problem was blamed on a computing malfunction. How wonderful this new technology dependent world is: sometimes.
October 6th 2020 - POWERED BY WIND - OUR PM SPEAKS
I have always believed that if you can understand, or even are aware of, the past, it will help you in the future. Learning history is far more important than many other subjects because with that knowledge you can,
perhaps, avoid future mistakes.
I have popped into this retrospective mood because our PM has announced that offshore wind farms will generate enough electricity to power every UK home by
2030. To environmentalists this is good news. Indeed it should be good news for all of us who want our planet to have a sustainable future. Harnessing the natural
power of the wind to provide electricity and entwining it with increased nuclear power looks good
Yet, I am sure that years ago, when we started to build those old coal fired power stations we all thought it was a good idea. I agree something has to be
done but I would like to hear that a thorough study has been made to make sure it is the right way to go and, more importantly, everything that might go wrong
has been examined.
Offshore wind farms are only a major threat to ships. Am I right? The electricity they will produce can easily be connected to the homes that need it. Am
I right?.
My concern, as always when a politician makes a statement, is how easy will it be to turn it into a reality. It may well produce 2,000 jobs in the
construction of the turbines but this has to be offset against the jobs lost in the oil industry and more conventional electricity production. Where was that
figure? The other thing is that our PM has said every home could be powered by wind farms but homes only account for one third of electricity consumption.
The rest goes to offices and factories. How will their electricity be produced?
I hope we can succeed because I want my children's children to be able to live on a planet that will thrive not just about survive.
October 7th 2020 - WHEN NOT WORKING IS ONLY VISIBLE TO THOSE NOT IN POWER
The government introduced restrictions in 20 areas of England early last month. The restrictions were aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19 infections
in areas where the rate of transmission was very high.
Yesterday, I learned that in 19 of those 20 areas, transmission has continued to climb, in some cases very strongly. A simple man, as I am, would deduce that
maybe the restrictions are not working. What do you do? Please send your answers, any answer, to the Prime Minister at 10 Downing Street because I'm not sure he
has any idea at all.
October 8th 2020 - AT LAST, SOME REALLY GOOD NEWS
The United States Electoral Commission, who control the presidential debates, have announced that the next debate will have to take place remotely. The current
President, Donald Trump has said he will not take part in any virtual TV debate with his Democratic rival Joe Biden.
Trump made his comments in a telephone call to the Fox Business Channel saying "I'm not gonna waste my time on a personal debate. Sit behind a computer,
ridiculous. They cut you off... I'm not doing a virtual debate." He also made some rude comments about the moderator.
Wierdly, Trump's campaign manager said the decision of the commission to rush to Biden's defence was pathetic, a word I would have used to describe Trump's
display in the first debate. I think the possibility to cut Trump off would be a blessing and far more playing to his defence.
Meanwhile Joe Biden summed things up perfectly by say "We don't know what the president's going to do. He changes his mind every second. For me to comment on
that now would be irresponsible." How can such a spoiled little brat have become President. My heart goes out to all citizens of the United States.
October 9th 2020 - "BUT WHENEVER MONDAY COMES YOU CAN FIND ME CRYING ALL THE TIME"
Now we are all truly agog as we wait for our much maligned, correctly in my view, Prime Minister to speak to us on Monday with the latest ideas to come from intense cabinet discussions. I must admit that most boy scouts could probably come up with something better from their own in tents discussions. Reliable sources are saying, and let's face it this government operates through leaking from reliable sources, that the Cabinet have not yet reached agreement on how to operate the three tier system that has been leaked as the next solution but, quite seriously, if you have only shed three tears over the way this has all been handled you haven't been following things that closely.
Monday is the day of disclosure and I hope that this closure of this part of our fight against this pandemic achieves something more than previous ones.
October 12th 2020 - FOOD IS A NECESSITY NOT A LUXURY, DON'T EXPLOIT THE YOUNG
I've decided to defer my grumping about BOJO's speech to the nation tonight because it takes time to assess what he's said, what we were supposed to think it
meant and what it really means. That will appear tomorrow night.
Instead I want to react to something I have found out, hopefully true, from the BBC website about the way students are being treated and to be honest I'm
horrified. There is no doubt that if everyone adheres to the current government guidelines we are hitting young people the hardest. They have already, in some
cases, had the farcical situation about their exams this summer, the stress of whether they can go to uni and the situation now where many of them are virtually
imprisoned on campus. I think most people, experts, too, agree that the death toll of this virus has fallen on the elderly. Young people may carry it, may transmit
it and may be ill from it but, in general, it is not fatal. They are suffering for us, the oldest generation and I would like to thank them for that.
What has really annoyed me is how these students, unable to go out, socialise, have fun and make the most of this time of their lives, are being treated.
There are stories that food being provided for them is out of date. I am an old age pensioner and my weekly food bill is usually less than 30 pounds per week. I have
seen instances where students are being charged 170 pounds for 10 day isolation. Really? What's more undergraduates say food parcels are full of junk food such as pot
noodles and frozen ready meals. Showing a nice sense of humour, one student said the only thing saving them was that half of them had Covid and can't taste the
food anyway.
I read that the University of York give students the option of a 70 pounds meal deal for their 10 day isolation. This consists of a sandwich, crisps, chocolate
and water. If there were three meals a day, the cost is 170 pounds for ten days, about 4 times my weekly food bill. It is opportunism at the expense of the young people
who are suffering so much. Some universities actually charged 30 pounds for washing 7kg of clothes.
When I started these blogs some 5 years ago many people expected pieces which complained about the young generation. It hasn't happened. I truly feel sorry
for them during this pandemic, both those imprisoned at uni and those who have found themselves unemployed because of lock-down. It is, though, to my eyes if these
stories are true, quite clear that some universities are profiting from self isolating students.
October 13th 2020 - I WAS RIGHT TO WAIT - THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT
Pretty good judgement on my part in deciding to wait a day before commenting, or grumping, about our leader's speech last night. If you remember, at the start
of this pandemic, the government were very keen to let us all know that they were following the science, they were being guided by the experts.
Less than half an hour after the press briefing finished, the minutes of a SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) meeting back in September were
published and it was pretty obvious that the government is no longer following the SAGE recommendations. Three weeks ago the group suggested an immediate short
national lock-down. They also felt that the 10.00pm curfew would have little effect, that university teaching should all be done on-line, that all bars, restaurants,
cafes, indoor gyms and hairdressers should be closed and there should be no contact between households inside homes. The only suggestion the government appeared
to follow was to encourage working from home if you could despite having said a few weeks earlier that people should go back to work.
If you listened to that press briefing you may have also noticed that Chris Witty stated that he had no confidence that the measure announced a few minutes
before would actually reduce the transmission of the disease.
I'm fed up. This is a mess and now we know that BOJO and his team are completely responsible for the mess. I don't deny that balancing the economy against
slowing the "r" number is difficult but one thing, to my little brain, needs to be remembered. If we don't depress the transmission rate, firms will collapse.
If we do lock-down and depress the rate, firms will collapse. But the big difference is if we don't depress that rate, everything will collapse. Beating the
pandemic is the most important thing to do. When we have we can rebuild. If we don't we will have nothing to rebuild and fewer people to do it.
October 14th 2020 - IS DOING NOTHING THE SAME AS RULING NOTHING OUT?
I listened to Prime Minister's question time today and, once more, realised the futility of it all when one of the people involved has no intention of taking
part. It's not a good advertisement for any young person watching and I fear an even worse one for Eton and Oxford.
BOJO kept repeating the same old thing about the leader of the opposition, a man quite clearly way more intelligent than the BOJO. He kept saying he supported
us on Monday in Parliament but now he's changed his mind. BOJO didn't seem to understand....anything. BOJO didn't seem to understand that after he made a statement
in the Commons and then went on TV to speak to the nation, new facts came to light.
Now personally I am delighted that a highly intelligent man can see these new facts, understand them and then, in light of being aware of these new facts,
change his mind. I'm concerned that our PM couldn't grasp this might happen.
The other problem, and maybe life lesson, for BOJO is if you keep asking Captain Hindsight why does he criticise if he hasn't got an alternative then when
he presents an alternative, backed by expert opinion, you look plonker of the year if you can't produce any facts to back up your decision.
BOJO did say that although he knew he was right (I might be making this bit up but the gist is correct) he ruled nothing out and for the time being that
is what he would do. Circuit breaker within two weeks. You heard it here.
October 15th 2020 - CLARITY IS A RARITY THAT DOESN'T BRING PARITY
It is obviously completely clear as to how the government is clamping down on Covid transmission. We have Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3.. Various areas are placed
in one of these tiers. Clarity disappears when you try to discover whether there is a level of transmission that would move an area from one level to another. This
applies in both directions.
I have been told that as I am shortly to be in Tier 2, if I pop up the road 20 miles to a Tier 1 area I still have to abide by the rules in my area. So people
who live in a Tier 1 area can fraternise in pubs using the rule of six, when I am in their area I can't. No one has been able to explain what happens to people from
a Tier 1 who come into Tier 2. Do they abide by the rules in their area or not?
I would love to think we were just one country, treated the same, helping each other. I would also like to know, or even believe, that the experts the
government have appointed were being listened to when the give their views.
October 16th 2020 - WELCOME BACK TO AN OLD FRIEND
Just when you thought it wasn't safe to go out again, just when you didn't think the government could bungle anything else, Brexit rears its head again.
Now strictly speaking you can't call it Brexit anymore because we have brexited and nothing can change that fact. We left the European Union on 31 January 2020.
Fact. I put that in because yesterday I heard the Conservative MP for Ipswich somewhere stating that it was important we honoured the vote of 2016. We've done that.
It's over. We've left.
What happened after we left is that we agreed with the EU to have eleven months in which we would negotiate a trade deal and sort out a few other things.
BOJO said it would be the easiest trade deal in the world. BOJO said we hold all the cards. BOJO said all that and more and he got the vote of quite a lot of
you who thought he was telling the truth.
We have now been negotiating for nearly nine months and still nothing is signed. BOJO, with a lack of understanding of simple geography, thought it would
be easy to have the same deal that took Canada and the EU eight years to bring into force. I guess that BOJO thought that as it had been done for Canada all we needed
to do was substitute United Kingdom for Canada in the treaty. Oh BOJO! Canada is almost 7,000 kilometres away from the nearest EU country, we're 40. Canada is not
joined to the EU by a tunnel, we are. Canada was never governed by EU rules, we were. The EU didn't fish in Canadian waters, they do in ours. How anyone with
an ounce of intelligence could think we could negotiate the same deal in a tenth of the time is way beyond me.
In September he said the deadline was October 15th to sort things out or we would walk away and leave with no deal. On October 15th he said he would say
something tomorrow. He did. He said we should prepare for no deal but implied we could still keep trying otherwise, of course, he would have said we're leaving
with no deal. About an hour after he said this, a government spokesman said talks were over. It's no deal. Sensibly the EU seems to be ignoring what the British
government and BOJO say and waiting to see what they do. If only they realised how much better off they will be without us, especially this present government.
My biggest fear is that BOJO will get confused and enter into a three tier trade agreement with the EU and, subject to whatever goods each area produces,
and have a no-deal Covid where you pick a card to see who has to be isolated and stick with it. You can't deal again.
October 19th 2020 - THE TITS ARE PECKING AT OUR BRAINS AGAIN
My dislike, distrust and quite often disgust at our press media is well-known to anyone who follows this diatribe. No one in their right mind calls them
newspapers any more, an idea the BBC have taken on with their daily slot on their news website called "The Papers". Sadly their inconsistencies manifold here as
a little further down it states "Newspaper headlines".
However, in my view, these collections of print on a white surface are just pieces of paper on which journalists, editors and newspaper owners are given
space to voice their own, highly bigoted, opinions and seek, nay desire, to influence the thoughts of their own readers without any regard for the actual truth.
It was announced by the Labour leader and first minister in Wales that from Friday this week the country would be going into a "firebreak" situation. This
is a circuit break by any other name but by using a different word it implies they are not doing the same as many are suggesting the UK government should do.
Rest assured, they are doing exactly the same. Whether it works or not, I am not qualified to say. Many experts seem to think it could slow COVID down, a few don't.
I suppose the obvious thing is that it will but what do you to do when your fire breaking circuit ends is far more important. Otherwise you will simply be hoping
from firebreak to firebreak for the foreseeable future.
However this particular grump came about because of a leader article in The Sun which seems to make fun of the Labour leader in Wales, their choice to
emphasise his political party, by saying how brave it is of him to volunteer his people for house arrest, joblessness and ruin. This, they say, is just to
test the scientifically dubious theory that a new lock-down may set Covid back.
It is a blatantly political piece as it fails to say that any area which the government has put under tier three is, effectively, having its people put
under house arrest, joblessness and ruin. Secondly, there is proof that a lock-down does set COVID back. We did it before and it worked, almost all other European
countries have done it and it worked. It is not a dubious theory. It is the screaming bloody obvious. The problem, as I stated above, is what to do when lock-down
ends.
It is pure Murdoch paper speculation and designed, in my opinion, to influence readers not inform them. Lord Reith's idea of television being there to
educate, inform and entertain has been adjusted for the tabloid printed media to being there to Trample truth, Influence and Titillate the public and, in
the modern acronym over-use, I despise the TITs who peddle this rubbish.
October 20th 2020 - IT'S TURNING INTO A FARCE BUT NOT WITTY
We are not a united country and I'm talking about England here. We are not a well-governed country either. The farce of today's briefing from Downing Street
and the ridiculous situation with Greater Manchester is an embarrassment to anyone who would like to feel proud about being English. I've lived through other
similar situations and, on reflection, they all occurred under a Tory PM. Heath, Thatcher and now Johnson all brought a feeling of shame for some of their actions.
The problem is, as I see it, that they don't want to govern by consensus, they try to govern by imposition. It doesn't work. BOJO's performance tonight was
nothing short of woeful, pathetic, blundering. He lost his notes, he failed to clearly answer any questions, and he looked a wreck, both sartorially and
intellectually. I remember David Cameron once suggested his mother would not approve of Jeremy Corbyn's attire but at least he looked respectable. BOJO has
obviously created an indoor garden at No. 10 as he definitely had gone through a hedge backwards before arriving at the lectern and that would be my mother's
opinion.
I'm not one for conspiracy theories but I did hear from JVT, deputy Chief Medical Officer, that a national lock-down was no longer the correct option.
The Chief Medical Officer had said something different both within Sage and implied at the last briefing. Now, where was Chris Witty tonight. I'm sure he wasn't
writing his resignation letter.
October 21st 2020 - HOW TO SCORE AN OWN GOAL - HYPHENATED OF COURSE
Today we have seen a parliamentary debate about whether children should suffer hunger or not. That was the simple fact. The motion, put forward by Labour,
was that the government should offer free schools meals over school holidays until Easter 2021. It was defeated by 322 votes to 261. Five conservatives, with in
my view a conscience, voted for the motion, the rest didn't.
Even worse were some of the comments made by Tory MPs in the debate. One such MP, a Mr Clarke-Smith, presumably hyphenated as being a Clarke or a Smith is a
bit common, said he did not believe in nationalising children. Presumably the same children who go to school to study the national curriculum. He felt that we
should have a PR campaign encouraging absent parents to take some responsibility for their children.
The problem is, Mr Clarke-Smith, that like possessing the feelings of compassion among Tory MPs, it is only the minority of parents who don't take
responsibility. Mr C-S then took a dig at celebrity virtue signalling on twitter by proxy. An interesting comment but one I can neither uphold or decry as I have
no idea what it means. In simple language I think he was referring to Marcus Rashford's campaign to get help for poor families. Mr Rashford, as I understand, came
from a family where funds meant mealtimes were a problem. I applaud his efforts to make this matter public and his method of doing so. I am not a football fan,
I know little about him but from what I have seen and read he seems a very passionate and articulate campaigner and, if he uses twitter to get his point across,
then that is the modern way; sorry C-S. I fear that ridiculing and dismissing such a celebrity is a big own goal by Mr Clarke-Simth
I have always admitted I had a very privileged childhood and education. I was lucky. I do not believe that those less lucky should be denied basic help. No
child should ever suffer hunger. No caring parent should ever have to worry about giving their children basic needs. Marcus Rashford has raised thousands to help.
Sadly another of those majority Tory MPs that lack passion, Mr David Simmonds, the MP for the impoverished area of Ruislip, Pinner and Northwood, asked what
did it say about the opposition's priorities when their interests are swept aside in favour of currying favour with wealth and power and celebrity status, spending
taxpayers money to curry favour with celebrity status, wealth and power. Well here's an idea Mr Simmonds, let's put up the higher rate of tax to show that the
Tory party do not curry favour in such areas. I'm sure, if he knew such an increase would help alleviate child hunger and poverty Mr Rashford would pay. Will your
greedy, money grabbing, wealth crazed, Tory donating, top executives or will they all flee the country?
October 22nd 2020 - FICTION AND MPs
Tom Watson, ex deputy leader of the Labour Party and an ex MP has written a fictional novel. It seems that many MPs, some ex, some still sitting, have taken this
route. It would appear that MPs have an ability to portray fiction. I only mention this in context of the next few paragraphs.
Cast your minds back some six months when dear old, and he is looking it, BOJO stood at his lectern and alongside him was Dodo Harding, the woman who would
lead our world beating track and trace system. BOJO has continued to claim its world beating status and DODO has continued to lead it, also becoming interim head
of the body that has replaced Public Health England. DODO is married to a Conservative MP, John Penrose, who is part of a think-tank known as 1828 which had called
for the NHS to be replaced by an insurance system and for Public Health England to be scrapped. Just saying.
Yesterday BOJO was back at his lectern but this time, perhaps realising he could not compete with Watson's ability, the PM admitted that the track and trace
system needed to improve. Back in June he had proudly proclaimed that everyone would have their test results back in 24 hours. Figures for the week ending 14 October
show that just 15.1% actually did that week. Now you could argue that may be a world beater but let's not. Johnson then appeared to try to shift the blame to the old
general public by saying that "We need to make sure that people who do get a positive test self-isolate - that's absolutely crucial if this thing is going to work
in the way that it can". However one could argue that if you have not got your result back in 72 hours, isolating may be a bit late.
Another major failing in this system is that for all those people who did get a positive result only 60% of their close contacts were actually reached. Sir
Patrick Valence, the Chief Scientific Officer, made a brief attempt to paint a nice picture by saying the capacity for testing had increased, but then admitted that
it was very clear there was room for improvement. A fine example of litotes when it is clear there is not just a room for improvement there is whole bloody 240 room
palace for improvement. I feel proud to have managed to fit Sir Patrick's litotes example in the same post as BOJO's hyperbole on track and trace.
On that point of use of English I must criticise Sir Patrick for some of his almost way beyond bloody obvious, and hence useless, statements coupled with
meaningless ones.. Yesterday he said:-
- The numbers (of cases) speak for themselves. They are increasing and they are not going to decrease quickly. (OBVIOUS)
- I think it is likely that some measures of restriction are going to need to be in place for a while to try and get those numbers down.. (MEANINGLESS - for how long and OBVIOUS)
- A lot depends now on what happens over the next few weeks.(OBVIOUS)
- At the moment, the numbers are heading in the wrong direction but there are some signs in some places of a potential flattening off of that. (OBVIOUS and MEANINGLESS as the flattening out might be in the Scilly Isles)
- We need to wait and see and monitor the numbers very carefully.(OBVIOUS)
Let's just say I have little confidence in those running this thing and the disappearance of the aforementioned DODO should not lead us to think she has become
extinct.
October 23rd 2020 - MIRACLES OR EXTINCTION
I thought we'd finish what has been a fairly heavy week for grumping with a look at that non-extinct Dodo I talked about yesterday. In 2017 she was appointed
as the chairperson of NHS Improvement responsible for overseeing all NHS hospitals as well as independent providers of NHS-funded care. She had been made a life peer in
2014 and it was recommended that she resign as a Conservative peer and sit as a crossbench peer to give the public and parliament more confidence that she could
challenger government policy. Dodo did not agree to this.
In May of this year, Matt Hancock put her in charge of the Track, Test and Trace process. In August of this year it appeared that Dodo, evidently completely
not extinct, was to become the first chairperson of the National Institute for Health Protection, a new body that will be formed as a result of the merging of Public
Health England and NHS Test and Trace. Quite a few health experts were highly critical of this decision citing that Dodo did not have a background in
health or, it might seem, efficiency.
From 2010 until 2017 Dodo had been the CEO of TalkTalk. In 2015 TalkTalk experienced a cyber attack which, ultimately, cost them 60 million pounds and lost
them 95,000 customers. During the hack Dodo was asked if the affected customers data had been encrypted and replied "The awful truth is that I don't know". This
prompted a article with a headline "TalkTalk boss Dido Harding's utter ignorance is a lesson to us all". Not though to Matt Hancock it would seem. She stepped
down and said she would now be concentrating on her public service activities. Sadly, she meant it.
Track, Test and Trace has, at best, been a one third success. Testing capacity has increased but then so has the time taken to get a result so maybe a one
sixth success. I read a story that she bought a horse back in 1993 which had a good success rate in races. She was quoted as saying that the horse taught her that
dreams come true and miracles can actually happen. I suggest she buys another because a miracle is exactly what is needed to have this world-beating Track and
Trace system, now under her total control.
October 26th 2020 - GRUMPY LEADS THE WORLD
It would seem my subtle (haha) suggestions that Dodo Harding was not up to the mark in leading Test and Trace are mirrored by a very respected, senior Tory MP.
Sir Bernard Jenkin has been an MP for nearly thirty years and is the chairperson of the Liaison Committee in the House of Commons, the only committee that gets to
question the sitting Prime Minister,
Sir Bernard, who I believe had obviously read my Thursday and Friday grumps but almost certainly had not, wrote a piece for the Telegraph in which he said
there was a vacuum of leadership in Test and Trace which was affecting compliance. This vacuum was clearly sucking up a mish-mash of disasters into the system.
Sir Bernard said that public consent and co-operation with England's system was breaking down. He suggested, worryingly in my view, that a senior military person
should be in charge of the system.
In a delightfully cushioned comment he said that Dodo should be given a well-earned rest so she and others could reflect on the lessons learned so far.
It is, perhaps, a trifle worrying that he thinks the person put in charge of running the Test and Trace system is incapable of learning any lessons while in the
job. Then Sir Bernard wrote that "there is a spaghetti of command and control at the top, which is incapable of coherent analysis, assessment, planning and delivery".
What a lovely phrase, a spaghetti of command. Did he mean solid and intransigent unless drowned in water or did he mean so many different ends and no connection.
Maybe he meant that when you get your teeth into it, it just dribbles down your chin.
Whatever, he finished by saying people lack faith that there is a coherent plan. No Sir Bernard we do not. We know there is no plan at all, coherent or
otherwise. We are bumbling from one briefing to the next and it's pathetic. We end up with a ravioli of results and a macaroni mess.
October 27th 2020 - SORRY SEEMS TO BE THE EASIEST WORD
I'm not convinced that it is good form for a BBC journalist, Victoria Derbyshire, to announce that, if the same COVID rules are in force at Christmas, she
will break them. She said this in an interview with the Radio Times, conducted some weeks ago. She is part of a family of four but she said that her mum and her
mum's partner and her own partner's dad would all be together, making seven. This would happen, she said, even if the rule of six was in place at the time.
This morning, in the modern tradition, she apologised, saying she was wrong and her comments had been hypothetical. This seems to excuse her. It shouldn't.
The earlier
hypothetical comment was a very serious misjudgement by a very public figure. It happens far too often these days from a misspeaking Prime
Minister through MPs who claim their comments were taken out of context yet cannot, or do not, provide the context to sportsmen who comment in the heat of the
moment.
I believe that if all these people can make serious misjudgments in the comments they make, the words they use, then they will almost certainly make
misjudgements in other areas of their jobs. Sorry does not excuse any behaviour. Young people, on hearing all of this, will be raised thinking making an apology
for words or behaviour excuses any punishment or condemnation for that behaviour. It shouldn't. I certainly no longer view Ms Derbyshire as a reputable, honest,
capable journalist.
October 28th 2020 - GRUMPLESS ....... FOR NOW
I have to be honest, someone must, and admit that nothing has forced me into a grump today. I have to also admit that I have been pretty busy elsewhere and
not followed the news that closely. Could be major grump being expressed tomorrow. Watch out.
October 29th 2020 - A MODERN DISEASE WHICH COULD BE CONTROLLED
I was taking an early morning look at Facebook this morning and I realised that, unless there are some photos or a bit of writing from one of my 50 or so
friends, I don't believe anything else on there. Seriously, I see a photo and I assume it's been photo-shopped. I see what looks like a funny accidental video
and I assume it's been staged and I see some piece of news or opinion and I know it's just that. An opinion of a nobody.
On reflection I felt this was a sad state of affairs but it's what the modern world, where everyone is an expert or worse still can pretend to be an expert,
has led us too. Yesterday several sections of the media ran a story about the return of Woolworth's to the High Street. A few hours later they had to retract the
story as it was a hoax. The twitter account containing the press release was, so I read, littered with mistakes but these media people, eager for a scoop, ignored
that.
Once upon a time I believed the media, the news media. Their stories appeared in print and if it was "fake news" at least you had a culprit and their standing
as a provider of news was damaged. Now everyone and anyone, and a few beyond, can stick a story on social media and it doesn't matter if it's true or not because
it is unlikely you will be able to trace the source. I know of people, and I have experienced it myself, where someone has set up a WordPress account or something
similar and spread completely fabricated lies, with just a smattering of truth, about someone.
Some of us can take it and ignore because we know it's not true, others are not so strong. This leads me into another subject where it appears old BOJO is
dragging his feet a bit, namely revenge porn. Yesterday Baroness Nicky Morgan, who this blog berated when she was Education Minister, questioned why the government
had failed to protect women against people who threaten to, and indeed do, share intimate images online. She wanted to know why the government wasn't speeding up
legislating against it. She stated that over 15% of young women were being targeted.
The government is considering a Law Commission report on the matter but that all takes time. Lock-down has resulted in a spike in domestic abuse cases and
revenge porn is a part of that. We need action now. Scotland has acted. BOJO seems to put safeguarding women rather low on his list of priorities. An indication
of this is that the women and equalities minister in cabinet shares that portfolio with international trade and reducing the cost of soya sauce to the same level it has
always been seems more important. It's all very well restricting people's rights in order to try to stem a pandemic; it's not a good sign to fail to uphold women's
rights during that pandemic and beyond.
October 30th 2020 - TV COMPANIES, SPREADING THE COMPOST ON THEIR VEGETABLES
Let me preface this particular grump by letting you know that I seldom go back and read previous grumps. This has two major effects; I might inadvertently
grump about the same thing twice, maybe even with opposing views and I don't constantly realise how good I am. Leaving the second point to one side, and not open
to debate, I know I have quite often bemoaned the current state of British television, the innumerable channels, the constant repeats, the +1 channels and all that.
I don't watch much, in fact apart from a few shows, I only watch sport or news. Today, while awaiting the six o'clock news I saw a trailer for BBC Sounds or
something like that. Basically it said that what you could hear, or watch, was so good you wouldn't be able to stop. And there we have it. The premier
TV broadcaster, possibly in the world, doesn't want you to have a life. They want you to sit all day watching and listening to their programmes and if you miss
it or want to watch a whole series in one go, it's all on the iplayer or a boxed set.
We decry the rise in obesity but sitting all day being "entertained" by the BBC's endless output is surely one of the main factors for that growth. It's like
the local horticultural show in the village hall only it's run by TV companies. Who can produce the biggest vegetable, is it ITV, BBC or Sky? Who can persuade
someone to spend hours on end, or more likely on their back, watching mainly rubbish? If we, or more correctly you, as a generation cannot find ways of entertaining
yourselves, if you need to be spoon fed with the baby bio of constant TV, I dread to think where the world will be in ten years time.
October 31st 2020 - AN UNLIKELY PREVIEW OF THE REVIEW
I don't normally grump over the weekend but I felt, knowing BOJO is going to hold a briefing at 5pm, that I should let you know what an honest and courageous
leader will be saying to us. He would begin by telling us we will have to go into another full lock-down for the whole of November. He will admit he got it wrong
and this should have happened earlier. He will add that if it had been then he could have extended half-term by a week and only needed a fortnight of lock down measures.
He will announce that schools and universities must also close. He will say he has ordered the Chancellor to bring back all measures that were around during the
first lock-down. And then he will resign.
However we haven't got an honest and courageous leader so this one will probably tell us that he is bringing in this November lock-down because he wants us
all to have a good Christmas and after this lock-down he will relax everything during December. His attitude will be that he is doing it all for us for whom he
cares so much. He will leave schools and universities open, destroy the hospitality industry, have no idea what economic measures will be brought in and hope that
Professor Chris Witty and Sir Patrick Valence don't jump up and down shouting I told you so during the briefing.
He will also fail to mention that relaxing everything over Christmas will mean another lock-down in January but he will relax it again so we can all have a
good, transmissible Valentine's Day.
I may now take Monday off although I'm sure something will annoy me.